The European Sponsorship Association (ESA) has voiced its disappointment at the recently released Health Committee Report on Alcohol. Self-regulation activity by rights holders has not been acknowledged by the report, it says, and therefore the report should not claim to give a complete picture of the alcohol sponsorship landscape.
ESA had submitted a paper to the Health Committee giving important background to the steps being taken by organisations involved in alcohol sponsorship with regard to responsible marketing activity. The submission demonstrated the considerable element of self-regulation being undertaken by the alcohol sponsorship industry (rights holders and sponsors alike).
A further concern of ESA’s is the fact that the principal focus of the report’s research and investigations was football sponsorship. By focussing predominantly on one sport, the report has failed to factor-in other sports and events, such as arts and culture, which also rely upon alcohol sponsorship.
According to the report, drinks brands spend up to £800 million per annum on advertising and sponsorship, considerably outspending the amount spent on alcohol awareness campaigns. The report has suggested that advertisers and sponsors should be required to fund a health education promotion.
The Committee has proposed that no event should be sponsored by an alcoholic product if more than ten percent of those attending are under 18 years of age. This proposition is rejected by ESA on two counts. Firstly, it feels that the ten percent threshold is wholly unworkable and unsupported by any evidence that this will have any positive effect on reducing alcohol-related harm.
ESA argues that imposing such a stringent test will be tantamount to a blanket ban on alcohol sponsorship, as it is inconceivable to accurately assess which events count less than ten percent of children amongst their audience. As a result, and in order to maintain the essential funding provided by their alcohol sponsors, clubs could seek to restrict access to anyone under the age of 18, thereby having a significant negative social impact.
The alcohol industry already works to a voluntary 25 percent rule, in accordance with the Portman Group Code of Practice, and ESA says that it has seen no evidence to suggest that this self-regulation guidance is not working.
Whilst recognising that the issue of alcohol-related harm is significant and serious, the association states that there is no evidence to support a causal link between alcohol sponsorship and alcohol-related harm. The key issues, ESA believes, should be education and sales/packaging/availability rather than sponsorship.
Whilst calls for restrictions and bans on alcohol sponsorship continue, ESA is keen to stress that any such ban would have a significant adverse cultural, social and economic impact and has submitted independent evidence to the Committee on this point.